Twenty Indian soldiers died in the Galwan Valley clash of June 2020. Six years later, Chinese President Xi Jinping is preparing to return to India for the BRICS summit, putting a highly political question back in the spotlight, how far can relations recover from a confrontation that left families grieving and soldiers dead?
Xi is expected in New Delhi for the BRICS leaders’ summit on September 12-13, 2026, his first visit to India since 2019. The visit comes after a period in which the two countries have slowly rebuilt diplomatic contact, but without resolving their disputed Himalayan boundary.
The human cost of the breakdown still begins with Galwan.
On the night of June 15-16, 2020, Indian and Chinese troops fought in the Galwan Valley in eastern Ladakh. The Indian Army ultimately reported 20 Indian military personnel killed. China later officially acknowledged four deaths among its troops. The confrontation was the first fatal clash between the two countries since 1975.
The fighting was unusually brutal. Soldiers engaged at close quarters in a remote, high-altitude area, with rocks and improvised weapons (wooden sticks embedded with nails) reported in the confrontation. Indian troops also faced sub-zero temperatures and difficult terrain. Seventeen Indian soldiers who had initially been critically injured later died, taking India’s official death toll to 20.
Those deaths changed the relationship far beyond the mountain battlefield.
Also see:South China Sea: China Warned Philippines Mid-Speech
Also see: Quad Ministers Meeting Held in New Delhi Amid China Tensions
Also see: Trump and Xi Strike Tone in Beijing as US-China Tensions Simmer
Also see: Xi Jinping North Korea Visit: China Seeks Greater Influence
The deaths that changed India-China ties
After Galwan, India tightened scrutiny of Chinese investment, banned hundreds of Chinese mobile applications and suspended direct passenger flights between the two countries. Security concerns also affected Chinese technology companies operating or seeking to expand in India.
The military confrontation also produced a prolonged deployment along the Line of Actual Control, the de facto frontier between the two countries.
The diplomatic thaw that followed has therefore been gradual rather than a clean reset. India and China have worked through military and diplomatic channels to reduce tensions, while continuing negotiations over the boundary.
Ajit Doval and Wang Yi at India-China boundary talks in Beijing. Photo: PTI
That process produced a significant development on August 25, 2026, when Indian National Security Adviser Ajit Doval and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi held the 25th round of Special Representatives’ talks in Beijing.
The talks produced an eight-point outcome and consensus. The two sides agreed on additional senior military meeting points and two additional border military hotline channels. They also agreed to continue work on border management, increase cooperation on pilgrimage and border trade, hold a meeting on trans-border rivers in September and convene the next Special Representatives’ round in India in 2027.
But the document does not settle the boundary itself.
It explicitly calls for continued negotiations toward a “fair, reasonable and mutually acceptable” solution. That means the central territorial dispute remains unresolved.
Also see: Trump and Xi Strike Tone in Beijing as US-China Tensions Simmer
Also see: Xi Jinping North Korea Visit: China Seeks Greater Influence
Xi Jinping India Visit Comes After Galwan
Xi’s arrival therefore carries significance beyond another summit appearance.
The Chinese president last visited India on October 11-12, 2019. Since then, the relationship has passed through the Galwan deaths, military confrontation, diplomatic pressure and years of restricted economic engagement.
Channels reported on September 10 that relations have improved since the 2020 clash, but economic ties remain constrained by regulatory barriers, visa problems and mutual suspicion. India has eased some restrictions on Chinese investment and approved ventures such as the Dixon Technologies-Vivo partnership, but major Chinese companies remain cautious about expanding in India
The contrast is stark. Diplomatic mechanisms are reopening even as the consequences of the 2020 confrontation continue to shape the relationship.
The August 2026 agreement is evidence of practical cooperation, not a settlement of the border dispute.
Xi’s return to India will be closely watched not simply for handshakes and economic announcements, but for whether the improving relationship produces something more tangible, a more stable border and safeguards strong enough to prevent another generation of soldiers from paying the price of a dispute that still has no final settlement.
Also see:South China Sea: China Warned Philippines Mid-Speech
Also see: Trump-Xi summit ends with modest trade signals as deeper US-China tensions persist
Also see: Trump and Xi Strike Tone in Beijing as US-China Tensions Simmer
Also see: Xi Jinping North Korea Visit: China Seeks Greater Influence
